Microsoft Azure-Rezensionen und Produktdetails

Its similar like other docker registry and same native docker commands supports, Cool integrations available for AKS service and Multi-cloud supported registry for all types Docker orchestrator

Nothing much differences , Its similar like other container registry service example like Gcloud container registry services, I used both of them and I didn't fine any differences, One thing I noted they dont have vulnerability scanning in the registry services itself, we have to use the third party for Container vulnerability scanning

My customer using enitre new microservices running in Azure and we are using the ACR as container registry platform

I like how popular it is but not the UI of it. It has a lot excel import and export features!

The UI is not good. Makes it look old fashion, but simple to use. I wish it was more fun to use.

Keep all information secure and locked.

The integration of azure with other microsoft products literally work hand in hand. It is simple to use and contains a cache of data.

The fact that you have to have azure to keep your data in the cache or use the data,

A bigger reach within the microsoft framework especially since we are targeting corporations

I love how you can access Azure queues almost in real time.

Some folders that you open don't update quickly when new files, blobs, or queue items are added. In fact clicking refresh doesn't always update where you're viewing.

Using Azure storage for many different aspects of web apps including log storage, data storage, and queues to act on within web apps.

We stored JSON files in Azure Blob Storage and found it very responsive and easy to imp;ement.

Not much. Setup & config was difficult the first time in, but the learning curve isn't bad. I found Azure Blob Storage easy to navigate and use with Power BI tools.

Storage & reporting of MS Dynamics AX data

Azure has a wide range of VM images and an easy to navigate user interface. Besides the marketplace has a wide range of solutions and VM images that can be easily deployed.

VM pricing is a little steep for the specifications and data storage / use. Besides, it would be helpful to include the per hour cost which was previously displayed. It doesn't seem to be shown in the "sizing" menu.

It has provide a platform for me to do my research and development work without having to invest in additional hardware. Besides, the I am able to customize the hardware based on my needs, which may change every now and then.

The best part about Azure Virtual Machines is that it is easy to use

Sometimes it takes awhile to load certain features

I haven't encountered any business problems yet

I like the interface, improved performance and multiple boxes can provision with various versions of OS.

Estimation using the monthly price calculator and reality has great mismatches. Can include some more images or images of great demand created by users

Mostly used for developing SharePoint solutions. I can access my vm from anywhere and any devices. Great for working as a team.

I like that they are like physical computers. They are almost the same.

I had an issue connecting it to internet. I had to search in internet and dowload some dll. It finally worked but I lost a lot of time.

I am working with a computers client but with this machine I can connect to my enterprise network and do some stuff that I only can do there.

Azure is certainly the new Microsoft. Managing resources on Azure is very easy. Even a complete azure beginner (with basic cloud knowledge) will be able to get started in 10-15 mins. The cost is much more effective compared to AWS. Their instances are always reliable. Customer Service is excellent.

I currently use Linux Virtual machines to deploy my apps and Blob Storage for storage needs. Experimenting with CosmosDB now. No bad experiences so far.

Instead of buying and maintaining the hardware, I can now concentrate on developing the product. That's exactly what I wanted to do. Azure facilitated that.

The capability to deploy a Sharepoint server was particularly useful for my client. The solution integrated perfectly with the existing Microsoft-heavy client IT system.

There have been stability issues with Azure recently. This reduces certainty for clients. Microsoft should upgrade/update shortly.

My financial services client was able to store large amounts of data securely on the cloud using Azure VM, without having to overhaul an entire IT offering. This meant that the cultural change required was minimal.

Speed of deployment and ability to scale wuickly

Need to have people with specific platform expertise

Ability to be agile and scale quickly

It has an easy user interface and is very self-explanatory if you run into any issues.

the price seems a little steep for what is is

we're able to scale our projects that are bigger in size a lot faster and to more capability with azure

My favorite things about Azure Virtual Machines is the helpfulness and responsiveness of the service staff. I love the expansive features and its capabilities are huge.

The plans are kind of expensive, but they are worth it in the long run. I would cut the cost to have more people purchase.

I am running a Cloud platform and using Azure's Software as a service package. We have eliminated the o site server.

The service is really dynamic. It offers a lot compared to its. Competition

How long it takes to fully setup. But once you get going it’s fine

Physical space at the location

The user-friendly interface was easy to learn how to navigate. The Ribbon bar buttons are clearly labeled. Additionally the Help documentation is actually helpful and easy to access and use while in application. I also like the information about new Releases available for download that is given as soon as I open the application. It is easy to navigate and identify what I am looking for and open.

When I try to resize the columns when viewing a file they auto size to the size of the data in the column, I'm guessing that it really wouldn't be easy to word wrap long file names or date/times. I am very new to using the Storage Explorer, so the Create Snapshot functionality had to be explained to me by one of our developers before I was clear about the purpose.

Storage issues are being addressed by using the Microsoft Azure Storage and the Explorer. Easy access to the files that we are downloading nightly from a third party partner that are needed to synchronize our databases.

Firstly, it is very to use and configure to use Load Balancer for the azure web app. The secondly, it works very well and can handle many request coming to the website and has effective method to dividing the traffic.

The detection which web app is having issue is not good.

By moving to cloud, Azure Load Balancer resolve the issues that need to replace physical load balancer.

Many OS we can choose to use from Windows OS to Linux Distributions. Also we can scale up the VMs easily and just a short time.

There are some changes still need to restart VMs.

Sometimes we need to perform huge tasks so Azure VM can handle it successfully than local PC

This cloud platform serves our company's needs. The analysis of application performance is especially usefull.

The interface is not very attractive and could be improved.

We were looking to solve issues surrounding the application migration experience while managing application performance.

The implementation of the 8600 was pretty straightforward and trouble free. Once set up, data transfer to cloud performed well. And generally would recommend.

but there are a few things lacking. One: 25TB limit on NFS shares. Not sure why this is in place, but it immediately invalidated the hardware for use in resolving a local storage issue. Two: You have to deploy a VM appliance to HOST a NFS share. Other products do this out of the gate. To get fault tolerance, you have to cluster the appliance in some fashion. Too many extra steps! Three: Dedupe and compression rates are not trackable via reporting features. StorSimple needs to expand reporting options quite a bit.

create a cloud appliance that replicates the architecture and capabilities of the physical hybrid storage device